Gregory Wright wrote: > > On Nov 11, 2007, at 5:23 PM, Andre Oppermann wrote: > >> Gregory Wright wrote: >>> On Nov 10, 2007, at 10:28 AM, Andre Oppermann wrote: >>>> >>> Hi Andre, >>> I also took a look at the bge (4) driver in 7.0-BETA2. As far as I >>> can tell, >>> it does not support TSO (there is no ioctl supporting TSO enable/disable >>> as there is for the em(4) driver). >> >>> Might the chip --- a BCM5704_B0 --- not be completely initialized? This >>> might explain why the machine with the BCM5714_B3 chips works, while >>> the other machine shows the duplicate ACK bug. >> >> Perhaps. Do you see the duplicate ACKs in a tcpdump on both the sender >> and the receiver? If you see it on the sender too, then it must be a >> bug in our network stack or the driver (by requeuing the same packet >> over and over again). >> >> --Andre > > The logs show that the duplicate ACKs are generated only by the > receiver. I suspect a bug in the driver, perhaps the ACK packet > is not being removed from the TX buffer ring. Examining the transmitted > packets should be enough to rule out a network stack problem. Is > there any debugging infrastructure I can use or do I just have to > hack in on my own? We don't have an infrastructure to deal with this kind of driver problems. You have to instrument the driver code to report stuck mbufs. -- AndreReceived on Thu Nov 15 2007 - 23:00:35 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:22 UTC