On Nov 17, 2007 2:33 PM, Mike Andrews <mandrews_at_bit0.com> wrote: > On Sat, 17 Nov 2007, Kip Macy wrote: > > > On Nov 17, 2007 10:33 AM, Denis Shaposhnikov <dsh_at_vlink.ru> wrote: > >> On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 00:42:54 -0500 (EST) > >> Mike Andrews <mandrews_at_bit0.com> wrote: > >> > >>> Has anyone run into problems with MSS not being respected when using > >>> TSO, specifically on em cards? > >> > >> Yes, I wrote about this problem on the beginning of 2007, see > >> > >> http://tinyurl.com/3e5ak5 > >> > > > > if_em.c:3502 > > /* > > * Payload size per packet w/o any headers. > > * Length of all headers up to payload. > > */ > > TXD->tcp_seg_setup.fields.mss = htole16(mp->m_pkthdr.tso_segsz); > > TXD->tcp_seg_setup.fields.hdr_len = hdr_len; > > > > > > Please print out the value of tso_segsz here. It appears to be being > > set correctly. The only thing I can think of is that t_maxopd is not > > correct. As tso_segsz is correct here: > > > It repeatedly prints 1368 during a 1 meg file transfer over a connection > with a 1380 MSS. Any other printf's I can add? I'm working on a web page > with tcpdump / firewall log output illustrating the issue... Mike - Denis' tcpdump output doesn't show oversized segments, something else appears to be happening there. Can you post your tcpdump output somewhere? Thanks. -KipReceived on Sat Nov 17 2007 - 22:19:48 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:22 UTC