Could not -fno-strict-aliasing be considered as just another WARN level? At least then, there might be some pressure to eliminate strict aliasing warnings as a necessary component to moving to a higher WARN level. jmc ----- Original Message ---- From: David O'Brien <obrien_at_freebsd.org> To: John Birrell <jb_at_what-creek.com> Cc: ????????? Bill Hacker <askbill_at_conducive.net>; freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org Sent: Tuesday, November 20, 2007 7:20:28 AM Subject: Re: Tinderbox On Mon, Nov 19, 2007 at 10:33:50PM +0000, John Birrell wrote: > Unfortunately the tinderboxes run with custom CFLAGS. > I would change this if I could, but I'm not the first to mention > how frustrating it is. I have never seen a good argument for why > the tinderbox is different from the CVS defaults. One reason is that some of us (at least) have dreams of not compiling with -strict-aliasing. If we have any hope of doing so - the tenderbox needs to build without to keep new warnings of creaping up. -- -- David (obrien_at_FreeBSD.org) _______________________________________________ freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org"Received on Tue Nov 20 2007 - 14:35:50 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:22 UTC