On Sunday 18 November 2007 23:45:12 Kip Macy wrote: > On Nov 18, 2007 12:21 PM, Alexey Shuvaev > <shuvaev_at_physik.uni-wuerzburg.de> wrote: >> On Sun, Nov 18, 2007 at 08:24:36AM +0100, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: >>> Aryeh M. Friedman wrote: >>>> 2. I meant features not formats and since I am using amd64 no >>>> wine >>> >>> Setting up FreeBSD i386 in a jail seems to do the job for most >>> people. You can have a whole i386 system in a jail and it won't >>> even recognize it's running on an amd64 kernel. >> >> I have gone this way. Well, everything (including emulators/wine) >> compiles and installs fine, but i386-build of a wine does not work >> inside i386-jail hosted on amd64 machine. I don't remember exactly >> what happens on start, segment violation or something like this, >> with core dump. I think wine requires rather tight co-operation with >> the kernel and it is not possible to launch i386-wine on amd64 this >> way. > > Please file a PR on the Wine core dump. It's a known problem. The amd64 kernel doesn't preserve the segment registers (%es, %fs, %gs,...) when switching an ia32 context. Wine won't work without that.Received on Tue Nov 20 2007 - 20:45:07 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:22 UTC