On Tue, 20 Nov 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote: > Yar Tikhiy wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> SCHED_ULE seems to do an unfair job to processes with low niceness >> or with real-time priority. Here are my observations: >> >> A few days ago I noticed that music (played by Totem, Gnome's default >> player) would pause for a fraction of second each time I did something >> in X/Gnome, such as switched between windows, clicked on a link in >> the web browser, etc. Then I found that music was jerky only if >> the player ran with a negative niceness or a real-time priority: >> As soon as I returned it to niceness 0 and normal priority, sound >> became totally seamless notwithstanding my activity in X. >> >> The approximate value required for the effect to appear was niceness >> as low as -5 or RT priority as high as 10; niceness -1 or rtprio 1 >> wasn't enough. >> >> Curious, I substituted SCHED_4BSD for SCHED_ULE in my otherwise >> GENERIC kernel, and the jerkiness of sound was gone irrespective >> of the niceness or RT priority of the player. >> >> To rule out other possible causes, I also tried kernels with SCHED_ULE >> but without SMP or without debug stuff (INVARIANTS+WITNESS), but >> the issue was there in both cases, unlike in the case of SCHED_4BSD. >> >> Of course, X+Gnome+stuff isn't the clearest environment for debugging >> schedulers, but multimedia apps are rather sensitive to scheduling >> quality. This case should be rather obvious: When I click in an >> inactive window, some processes are woken that have been idle. >> After that the high-priority player isn't scheduled long enough for >> the hardware audo buffer to drain, although it would be scheduled >> soon if it had normal priority. >> >> Did I hit a known issue? > > Others have reported it, but I don't know if Jeff has had time to investigate > yet. I definitely knew about problems with positively niced tasks. I had not heard about the negative nice problems. This is my top priority as far as opensource goes. I've been unfortunately busy with other things however. I hope to get to this soon. Thanks, Jeff > > Kris > _______________________________________________ > freebsd-current_at_freebsd.org mailing list > http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-current > To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-current-unsubscribe_at_freebsd.org" >Received on Tue Nov 20 2007 - 23:08:05 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:22 UTC