Re: em0 panic: mutex em0 not owned

From: Attilio Rao <attilio_at_freebsd.org>
Date: Thu, 22 Nov 2007 13:27:16 +0100
2007/11/22, Attilio Rao <attilio_at_freebsd.org>:
> 2007/11/22, Benjamin Close <Benjamin.Close_at_clearchain.com>:
> > Hi Folks,
> >     With a recent current I'm now getting panics when em0 tries to come up:
> >
> > panic: mutex em0 not owned at ../../../kern/kern_mutex.c:144
> >
> > _mtx_assert() + 0xdc
> > _callout_stop_safe()+0x5d
> > em_stop() + 0x50 (if_em.c:2546)
> > em_init_locked()+0x47 (if_em.c:1256)
> > em_ioctl()+0x466
> > ifhwioctl() + 0x75f
> > ifioctl() +0xb0
> > kern_ioctl() + 0xa3
> >
> > This is even after atillos, latest patch.
>
> Yes, this is a race access to callout_stop() in em driver.
> callout_stop() needs to be called with callout-specific lock held
> otherwise you can get a race and this seems not happening. I just
> inserted this assertions in order to catch bugs like these.
> I have no time to double-check it, can you do?

Ok, basically em_stop() both wants to stop core callout and tx channel
callout but it only holds core lock. It needs to hold both in order to
stop both. As I'm not sure about lock ordering there I can't produce a
patch now so the ball is in jfv_at_ court (CC'ed).

Thanks,
Attilio


-- 
Peace can only be achieved by understanding - A. Einstein
Received on Thu Nov 22 2007 - 11:27:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:22 UTC