Nikos Ntarmos wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Wed, Nov 28, 2007 at 04:35:50PM +0100, Ivan Voras wrote: > >> Luoqi Chen wrote: >> >>> Has anyone else noticed that gprof no longer works with gcc 4.2 >>> >> It's a known bug (very irritating!), but I think noone is working on >> it so it won't be fixed in 7.0. >> > > Shouldn't that be considered a show-stopper of sorts? Is there some > suggested method for profiling one's code under 7.0 (e.g. revert to > gcc3* or wait for 4.3 to be released) or will 7.0R come out with > profiling out of the question? > > Cheers > > \n\n > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) > Comment: Nikos Ntarmos <ntarmos_at_ceid.upatras.gr> > > iD8DBQFHTflgm6J1ac+VFgoRAjg1AJ41ILLohJYngxqKZbtDLGwK7Coz6ACghUpn > 4U+E1nlBtXrIwH0YkZkr834= > =LHs4 > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > And to think that I mentioned this problem 5-6 months ago with gcc 4.2.x and now it finally gets publicity... Then again I wasn't aware of the register issue details with gprof. -GarrettReceived on Wed Nov 28 2007 - 23:30:50 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:23 UTC