Nikos Ntarmos wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Thu, Nov 29, 2007 at 08:24:52PM +0000, Luoqi Chen wrote: > >>> And to think that I mentioned this problem 5-6 months ago with gcc 4.2.x >>> and now it finally gets publicity... >>> >> Did I just hear someone volunteered to be a guinea pig? >> >> Garrett, would you like to try out my fix? It's actually quite simple, >> >> > [...] > >> This file is in the kernel tree, but the change only affects libc build. >> If you don't want to redo a world build, you may copy the patched profile.h >> to /usr/include/machine and "make all install" inside /usr/src/lib/libc. >> Then re-link -pg compiled code and try it out. >> > > Hi again. > > I couldn't wait for Garrett :) so I went on and tested your patch and > gprof seems to work fine for me (at least for the executables I was > interested in profiling anyway). This is i386 on a 7.0-BETA3 kernel and > 7.0-BETA1 world. What are the chances for this to be committed in time > for 7.0R? > > Thanks. > > \n\n > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) > Comment: Nikos Ntarmos <ntarmos_at_ceid.upatras.gr> > > iD8DBQFHT02Cm6J1ac+VFgoRAnaVAJ9n/WZY2nJU4Ym5qUFOBvg38p0lXQCfYDwT > moIVew3+UhMLXLuJGEZd6HM= > =J8RG > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > I'll be sure to give it a toss when I get back home. I'd expect a reply sometime tomorrow morning (PST).. Thanks again for all of your work! -GarrettReceived on Fri Nov 30 2007 - 01:42:55 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:23 UTC