On Nov 29, 2007 3:28 AM, Kostik Belousov <kostikbel_at_gmail.com> wrote: > Please, try the patch below and report whether it is enough to fix cmucl > and any other regressions. With this patch applied old and new binaries are delivered a SIGBUS instead of SIGSEGV and the si_code is always BUS_ADRERR. This is halfway between the behavior old binaries expect and the new behavior. When an access violation occurs, old binaries expect a SIGBUS and an si_code of BUS_PAGE_FAULT. Presumably, we want new binaries to receive a SIGSEGV when an access violation occurs. This patch does not consider whether we are running under an old or new binary. Is that really okay?Received on Fri Nov 30 2007 - 05:35:53 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:23 UTC