Aryeh Friedman wrote: > On 10/5/07, 韓家標 Bill Hacker <askbill_at_conducive.net> wrote: >> Aryeh Friedman wrote: >> >> *snip* >> >>> I have other reasons and goals then "I don't like the license" >>> specifically if I was going to start building an os under a SIW >>> license (http://www.flosoft-systems.com/miai/index.php and >>> http://www.flosoft-systems.com/blogs/aryeh/index.php [first three >>> enteries]) >> I'm certainly no paragon of typing or spelling accuracy myself, but I hope you >> won't be offended if I suggest taking a *spell checker* to both of those > > I thought they where basically well proof read... oh well... will go > through them again (particularly the second one) One thing professional writers learn very early (1960's): NO ONE can proofread their own work well. We 'see' what we *intended* to say - not what we actually typed. Spell-checkers are objective. Even when dead-wrong, they draw your eye to possible anomalies. ...and still miss a few. Such as the time a VP of Sales called me to whine that he didn't have a sister.... ??? One of my staff had published the new Sales Compensation Plan - having spell-checked 'blind'. Thereby turning 'incent', 'incentive', incentivize' to 'incest' ... and derivatives. Compilers are even less discriminate, BTW. ;-) BillReceived on Fri Oct 05 2007 - 04:18:05 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:18 UTC