Re: pad argument for mmap/lseek/etc.

From: Roman Divacky <rdivacky_at_freebsd.org>
Date: Mon, 8 Oct 2007 19:25:45 +0200

> The interesting question is whether the _SYS_SYSPROTO_H and absense of the
> sys/sysproto.h supported. Or, shall we remove these #ifdef blocks instead
> of fixing them in whole kernel.

I also support this idea... does anyone have an argument against or should I
just provide a patch (removing those definitions)

roman

Received on Mon Oct 08 2007 - 15:25:52 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Ralf S. Engelschall: "Re: cosmetics: bsdlabel fstype for ZFS partitions?"
Previous message: Claus Guttesen: "Re: ZFS kmem_map too small."
In reply to: Kostik Belousov: "Re: pad argument for mmap/lseek/etc."
Next in thread: John Baldwin: "Re: pad argument for mmap/lseek/etc."
Reply: John Baldwin: "Re: pad argument for mmap/lseek/etc."
Reply: John Baldwin: "Re: pad argument for mmap/lseek/etc."

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:19 UTC