Re: suggest renaming and extending the -CURRENT and -STABLE lines

From: Christian Baer <christian.baer_at_uni-dortmund.de>
Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2007 13:58:10 +0200 (CEST)

On Wed, 10 Oct 2007 16:39:59 +0200 Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:

> YMMV.  I run both CURRENT and STABLE on production systems.

That is your call to make and allways will be, even if the names are
changed. The point just is, that both are not recommended in the
documentation. And the -STABLE just doesn't reflekt that.

Regards
Chris

Received on Thu Oct 11 2007 - 10:05:59 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Christian Baer: "Re: suggest renaming and extending the -CURRENT and -STABLE lines"
Previous message: Marian Hettwer: "Re: mpt0: QUEUE FULL EVENT: Bus 0x00 Target 0x04 Depth 129"
Maybe in reply to: Christian Baer: "suggest renaming and extending the -CURRENT and -STABLE lines"
Next in thread: Christian Baer: "Re: suggest renaming and extending the -CURRENT and -STABLE lines"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:19 UTC