Nathan Whitehorn wrote: > > (I'm not subscribed to this list, so cc on replies if you want me to see > them) > Given that subscribing is free, easy, and doesn't rot your teeth or anything, one might presume you don't WANT to see replies? Might be helpful if we knew what you meant by 'destroyed' w/r those partitions. Do you mean it corrupted the disklabel? Made pudding with the directory structure? Or just munged the [few | many] files that were actively in-use? Softupdates is *supposed to* leave things as they were at some <not fully deterministic length of time> earlier state. It may lose some updates, but I've been rather rude to it, intentionally and otherwise, w/o making it lose any more than that... Details? Specifics? BillReceived on Wed Oct 17 2007 - 19:09:11 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:19 UTC