Re: Very slow HP 8 Internal Port SAS HBA with RAID 0, 1 on Hot Plug SAS/SATA Models (LSI SAS1068 - mpt)

From: Stefan Lambrev <stefan.lambrev_at_moneybookers.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Oct 2007 12:09:18 +0300
Hi,

Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 09:20:32AM +0100, Richard Tector wrote:
>   
>> Stefan Lambrev wrote:
>>     
>>>       
-skip-
>> 70MB/s from desktop drives is pretty respectabloe, IMHO.
>>     
>
> In a RAID 1 configuration, I would say 70MByte/sec read is more than
> decent.  That's about what I get from an individual drive on a built-in
> nVidia nForce 4 SATAII controller.  Here's a sequential read from a disk
> on that controller, using dd and gstat; sometimes it hits 78MB.
>
> ad10: 476940MB <Seagate ST3500630AS 3.AAE> at ata5-master SATA300
>
>  L(q)  ops/s    r/s   kBps   ms/r    w/s   kBps   ms/w   %busy Name
>     1    571    571  72850    1.4      0      0    0.0   82.0| ad10
>
> You might also want to verify that the disks are actually running
> at SATA300 speeds (which won't necessarily gain you a lot over SATA150,
> but worth turning on assuming it's compatible with your controller).
> Seagate drives, for example, have a little jumper on them that limits
> the interface to SATA150; remove it.
>
>   
da0: <LSILOGIC Logical Volume 3000> Fixed Direct Access SCSI-2 device
da0: 300.000MB/s transfers

Yes it is detected as SATA300, and the raid reports HDDs the same way.

May be I have wrong impression that mirror should increase read speed 
almost twice compared to
single disk, but I forget that bonnie++ was run as single thread.
May be if I start it with concurrency=2 then I'll see the real 
performance of the mirror ?
Or should I move to the thread to performance_at_  :)

-- 

Best Wishes,
Stefan Lambrev
ICQ# 24134177
Received on Thu Oct 18 2007 - 07:09:23 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:19 UTC