On Oct 27, 2007, at 10:58 AM, John-Mark Gurney wrote: > Yeh, you're solution was to simply declare that anyone who knows that > COM1 is at 0x3f8 is wrong, and to use a different, yet again arbitrary > solution which is which is listed first in ACPI... Exactly. Anyone who "knows" that COM1 is at 0x3f8 while the computer right in front of them clearly states that COM1 is at 0x2f8 is in denial. > So, if one ACPI implementation puts _UID = 0 at 0x3f8, but lists it > after _UID = 1 at 0x2f8, that it's fine for sio0 to be _UID = 1? Yes. sio0 is nothing more than the first serial port found during enumeration. > So, why are you continuing to argue about a simple thing that you > on your > machines can simply remove the hints? The ability to wire is good. Implementing it right is important. > What are your technical arguments > for mandating a different, non-historical, based arbitrary selection? I'm not mandating anything. I'm merely pointing out how reality has changed and that it's important to adapt, adopt and improve... Where are your technical arguments, putting aside the mere technically of the statement that you consider yourself an old fart? -- Marcel Moolenaar marcelm_at_juniper.netReceived on Sat Oct 27 2007 - 17:10:25 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:20 UTC