Re: ipfilter cannot be build within because warning's are present

From: Victor M. Blood <freebsd_at_masm.elcom.ru>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2007 12:31:12 +0300
On 25.10.2007, Darren Reed wrote:
> Please try the attached patch.

Hmm... All patches failed in /sys/contrib/ipfilter/netinet

Script started on Mon Oct 29 13:25:23 2007
release# patch -p4 <fr ip_fil_freebsd.c.patch 

Hmm...  Looks like a context diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|*** ip_fil4.1.28/ip_fil_freebsd.c       Thu Sep 20 05:51:50 2007

|--- ip_fil4.1.28a/ip_fil_freebsd.c      Sat Oct 20 22:29:37 2007

--------------------------
Patching file ip_fil_freebsd.c using Plan A...
(Fascinating--this is really a new-style context diff but without
the telltale extra asterisks on the *** line that usually indicate
the new style...)
Hunk #1 failed at 345.
1 out of 1 hunks failed--saving rejects to ip_fil_freebsd.c.rej
done
release# patch -p4 <fre ip_pool.c.patch 

Hmm...  Looks like a context diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|*** ip_fil4.1.28/ip_pool.c      Wed Oct 10 02:45:37 2007

|--- ip_fil4.1.28a/ip_pool.c     Wed Oct 24 19:59:13 2007

--------------------------
Patching file ip_pool.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 failed at 977.
1 out of 1 hunks failed--saving rejects to ip_pool.c.rej
done
release# patch -p4 < ip_pool.c.patchnat.c.patch 

Hmm...  Looks like a context diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|*** ip_fil4.1.28/ip_nat.c       Tue Oct 16 03:08:10 2007

|--- ip_fil4.1.28a/ip_nat.c      Sat Oct 20 22:48:19 2007

--------------------------
Patching file ip_nat.c using Plan A...
Hunk #1 failed at 187.
(Fascinating--this is really a new-style context diff but without
the telltale extra asterisks on the *** line that usually indicate
the new style...)
Hunk #2 failed at 817.
Hunk #3 failed at 888.
Hunk #4 failed at 1190.
Hunk #5 failed at 1201.
Hunk #6 failed at 1213.
Hunk #7 failed at 1229.
Hunk #8 failed at 1247.
Hunk #9 failed at 1267.
Hunk #10 failed at 1287.
Hunk #11 failed at 1361.
11 out of 11 hunks failed--saving rejects to ip_nat.c.rej
done
release# patch -p4 < ip_nat.c.patchrules.h.patch 

Hmm...  Looks like a context diff to me...
The text leading up to this was:
--------------------------
|*** ip_fil4.1.28/ip_state.c     Tue Oct 16 02:33:23 2007

|--- ip_fil4.1.28a/ip_state.c    Sat Oct 20 22:47:57 2007

--------------------------
Patching file ip_state.c using Plan A...
(Fascinating--this is really a new-style context diff but without
the telltale extra asterisks on the *** line that usually indicate
the new style...)
Hunk #1 failed at 653.
Hunk #2 failed at 672.
Hunk #3 failed at 683.
3 out of 3 hunks failed--saving rejects to ip_state.c.rej
done
release# exit

exit

Script done on Mon Oct 29 13:26:42 2007

-- 
With all regards, Victor M. Blood.   mailto: freebsd_at_masm.elcom.ru
FTN: 2:5024/1.95_at_Fidonet.org, ICQ#3567656
Received on Mon Oct 29 2007 - 15:04:56 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:20 UTC