Re: Constant stream of errors on msk0

On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 01:38:39AM -0400, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
 > 
 > On Tue, 2007-10-30 at 10:58 +0900, Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
 > > On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 01:40:37PM -0500, Joe Marcus Clarke wrote:
 > >  > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
 > >  > Hash: SHA1
 > >  > 
 > >  > Pyun YongHyeon wrote:
 > >  > 
 > >  > > 
 > >  > > Does the other GigE work without issues on Cisco 6500?
 > >  > 
 > >  > I haven't tried this card on another gigE switch.  However, the same
 > >  > switch port on the same switch did not exhibit these problems with the
 > >  > myk driver under 6.X.  At least as far as I know my desk port was not
 > >  > moved in the IDF.
 > >  > 
 > >  > > 
 > >  > > The msk(4) can have a bug with autonegotiation but I've never seen
 > >  > > negotiation mismatches on msk(4). Whilst writing the driver I've
 > >  > > checked speed/link negotiation against gigabit switch and directly
 > >  > > connected GigE and I found nothing unusual. Of course, that does
 > >  > > not necessarily mean msk(4) is perfect for link negotiation.
 > >  > > 
 > >  > > Because you've said myk(4) works well on Cisco 6500 I have to
 > >  > > diagnose the issue. When setting the link manually on gigabit
 > >  > > environments, nomally one side should be master and the other the
 > >  > > slave so how about forcing master bit on msk(4) side?
 > >  > > 
 > >  > > #ifconfig msk0 media 1000baseTX mediaopt full-duplex link0
 > >  > >                                                      ^^^^^
 > >  > 
 > >  > This does not help.  I tried 1000BaseTX/full, 100BaseTX/full, and
 > >  > 100BaseTX/half.  All three exhibited the same problem with constantly
 > >  > incrementing input errors.
 > >  > 
 > > Hi,
 > > 
 > > Are you still interesting in fixing autonegotiation issue on msk(4)
 > > at 1000bps?
 > > If so please try attached patch and let me know result.
 > 
 > Of course I'd be interested, but since the initial posting, I've moved
 > to a Catalyst 2950 switch, and I have not seen any autoneg problems with

Glad to hear that. :)

 > my msk and that switch.  I would not be able to adequately test this
 > patch.  Thanks for the follow through, though.
 > 

Ok, Thanks for quick reply.

-- 
Regards,
Pyun YongHyeon