On Friday 31 August 2007 22:43:23 David O'Brien wrote: > On Fri, Aug 31, 2007 at 09:20:30PM -0300, JoaoBR wrote: > > On Friday 31 August 2007 21:07:10 David O'Brien wrote: > > > > opterons are not easy but it is already kind of advanced cpu so > > > > could be > > > > > > Why are Opteron's any harder? > > > > because all of them are 64bit but some older ones are not SSE3 capable, < > > 250 I guess now but 252 is but not 100% sure > > It's not Opteron model # specific - but silicon revision specific. > There are rev C0 model 250's, along with rev CG, and rev E. > less than rev.E support SEE3 ? Do you have a spec/link for that? > Same for athlon64 - older ones don't support SSE3, newer ones do. > like I said before 'older ones' is kind of lame def > > people 'kind of familiarly' with reading manuals and specs are already > > having difficulties here so imagin an average user (unkndefspec) who > > likes to optimize his kernel (his cpu's kernel of course :) ) > > > > so as far as there are a cpu options for a freebsd kernel they should > > be understandable so it might be worse thinking well before doing > > (=less support = less questions = less problemas) > > BTW, the AMD offically sanctioned spelling for GCC 'march' is "amdfam10" I guess you agree without any objections that that this 'is 100% userfriendly' and could by add as '100% userfriendly' and so then I agree as well ... but ... will they print it on the box in order to see it ??? guess not ;) -- Joćo A mensagem foi scaneada pelo sistema de e-mail e pode ser considerada segura. Service fornecido pelo Datacenter Matik https://datacenter.matik.com.brReceived on Sat Sep 01 2007 - 00:08:23 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:17 UTC