Borja Marcos wrote: > > On 20 Sep 2007, at 10:37, Kris Kennaway wrote: > >> Borja Marcos wrote: >>> On 19 Sep 2007, at 19:35, Ivan Voras wrote: >>>> Borja Marcos wrote: >>>> >>>>> These are not innocuous messages, the machine is rejecting connections >>>>> like crazy. Any ideas? >>>>> The number of established TCP connections was around 490, and the >>>>> machine has 2 GB of RAM. >>>> >>>> Just a guess: what is your vm.kmem_size_max and have you tried >>>> increasing it? >>> It's the first thing I thought, and I cranked it to a very high value >>> just in case: >>> vm.kmem_size_max: 1073741824 >> >> You actually wanted to tune vm.kmem_size too or it may not actually >> change the value used (_max is just a ceiling for autotuning). >> However if this is i386 you can't set it that high without also >> adjusting KVA_PAGES too (which has other effects). > > It's an amd64. I understand that i386 is mostly out of the question if I > want to play reasonably safe with ZFS :) > > Oh, ok. I will try with both, then. Should I try the same value? Perhaps > it's a bit high, but I understand that with a 64 bit address space I can > set it sort of arbitrarily high without many side effects. Yes, you should set them both to the same value. KrisReceived on Thu Sep 20 2007 - 19:01:22 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:17 UTC