Re: [panic] sched_priority: invalid interactive priority 124 score -4

From: Kris Kennaway <kris_at_FreeBSD.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 01:33:29 +0200
Jeff Roberson wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote:
> 
>> On 9/23/07, Jeff Roberson <jroberson_at_chesapeake.net> wrote:
>>> On Sun, 23 Sep 2007, Peter Kostouros wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi
>>>>
>>>> I received the abovementioned panic on a system csup'ed and build a 
>>>> few hours
>>>> ago and have attached a debug session I hope will help.
>>>
>>> Peter,
>>>
>>> Thanks for your debugging efforts.  The problem was with my most recent
>>> commit.  You can back out to 1.207 or try this patch, which csjp reports
>>> fixes the problem:
>>>
>>> http://people.freebsd.org/~jeff/ulebugs.diff
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jeff
>>
>> Jeff,
>>
>> fetch http://people.freebsd.org/~jeff/ulebugs.diff && patch < 
>> ulebugs.diff
>> ulebugs.diff                                  100% of  914  B 8767 kBps
>> Hmm...  Looks like a unified diff to me...
>> The text leading up to this was:
>> --------------------------
>> |Index: sched_ule.c
>> |===================================================================
>> |RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/kern/sched_ule.c,v
>> |retrieving revision 1.208
>> |diff -u -r1.208 sched_ule.c
>> |--- sched_ule.c        22 Sep 2007 02:20:14 -0000      1.208
>> |+++ sched_ule.c        23 Sep 2007 17:33:02 -0000
>> --------------------------
>> File to patch:
>> No file found--skip this patch? [n] y
>> Skipping patch...
>> Hunk #1 ignored at 1410.
>> Hunk #2 ignored at 1865.
>> 2 out of 2 hunks ignored--saving rejects to sched_ule.c.rej
> 
> If you're not running 1.208 the patch won't apply.  On the positive 
> side, that also means you don't have this bug.

Looks like he's running patch from the wrong directory, i.e. not 
sys/kern/ where sched_ule.c is.

Kris
Received on Sun Sep 23 2007 - 21:33:30 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:18 UTC