Jeff Roberson wrote: > On Mon, 24 Sep 2007, Abdullah Ibn Hamad Al-Marri wrote: > >> On 9/23/07, Jeff Roberson <jroberson_at_chesapeake.net> wrote: >>> On Sun, 23 Sep 2007, Peter Kostouros wrote: >>> >>>> Hi >>>> >>>> I received the abovementioned panic on a system csup'ed and build a >>>> few hours >>>> ago and have attached a debug session I hope will help. >>> >>> Peter, >>> >>> Thanks for your debugging efforts. The problem was with my most recent >>> commit. You can back out to 1.207 or try this patch, which csjp reports >>> fixes the problem: >>> >>> http://people.freebsd.org/~jeff/ulebugs.diff >>> >>> Thanks, >>> Jeff >> >> Jeff, >> >> fetch http://people.freebsd.org/~jeff/ulebugs.diff && patch < >> ulebugs.diff >> ulebugs.diff 100% of 914 B 8767 kBps >> Hmm... Looks like a unified diff to me... >> The text leading up to this was: >> -------------------------- >> |Index: sched_ule.c >> |=================================================================== >> |RCS file: /home/ncvs/src/sys/kern/sched_ule.c,v >> |retrieving revision 1.208 >> |diff -u -r1.208 sched_ule.c >> |--- sched_ule.c 22 Sep 2007 02:20:14 -0000 1.208 >> |+++ sched_ule.c 23 Sep 2007 17:33:02 -0000 >> -------------------------- >> File to patch: >> No file found--skip this patch? [n] y >> Skipping patch... >> Hunk #1 ignored at 1410. >> Hunk #2 ignored at 1865. >> 2 out of 2 hunks ignored--saving rejects to sched_ule.c.rej > > If you're not running 1.208 the patch won't apply. On the positive > side, that also means you don't have this bug. Looks like he's running patch from the wrong directory, i.e. not sys/kern/ where sched_ule.c is. KrisReceived on Sun Sep 23 2007 - 21:33:30 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:18 UTC