Ivan Voras wrote: > Daichi GOTO wrote: >> Hi Guys again >> >> Today is not unionfs. > > How is the unionfs patch progressing through re ? :) I hope it gets > digested soon :) I have sent a aprove request to re_at_ and been waiting for replay. I have a hope to get aproval mail too :) I beleive in that recent unionfs patches bunch is well viewed and working very good. >> We have created safety expansion for rm(1). If you have any interests, >> please try follow patch. >> >> http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/safety-rm/ > > This looks useful, but shouldn't this feature be handled more globally, > with a MAC policy or something like that? Yes, that is not depending to MAC or other comprehensive access framework. At the beginning, what's important is that I have anyone needs that feature or not ;-) If someone needs that feature, I will get the work of more comprehensive mechanism.Received on Tue Sep 25 2007 - 14:33:33 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:18 UTC