On Tuesday 25 September 2007 03:38 pm, Jung-uk Kim wrote: > On Monday 24 September 2007 01:03 pm, Nate Lawson wrote: > > Jung-uk Kim wrote: > > > (At least on my laptop) I found the malloc() was called from > > > our code, i.e., AcpiOsExecute() from OsdSched.c. I'll try > > > something shortly cause I was going to rewrite the file anyway. > > > > Yep, that's because we need a task structure that's different for > > each call and acpi-ca doesn't like the "pending" argument (see > > OsdSchedule.c). One fix for this is to just use a hack and cast > > the fn to discard the extra arg. Not sure this would work. > > I quickly tested it but didn't work. :-( > > Actually it is not just pending argument but struct task itself has > to be allocated. I did crude hack to see if it is possible to have > it working with spin mutex gracefully. It can be done if we > pre-allocate some space for the tasks and use fast taskqueue. Does > it make sense to you? FYI, here is the hack: http://people.freebsd.org/~jkim/acpica/Osd.diff Jung-uk KimReceived on Tue Sep 25 2007 - 19:37:43 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:18 UTC