On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 07:56:49AM -0700, Darren Pilgrim wrote: > Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > >I think what you're not noticing is that the cores are being launched in > >non-sequential order. 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, 5, 6. This isn't a problem. > > Why they wouldn't be launched sequentially? First SMP rule: Don't expect a specific execution order from things running parallel. I don't know the code, but would assume that they are started sequentially and each core prints it's own line, so they get disordered. -- B.Walter http://www.bwct.de http://www.fizon.de bernd_at_bwct.de info_at_bwct.de support_at_fizon.deReceived on Fri Sep 28 2007 - 16:47:16 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:18 UTC