In message <480E589C.8010108_at_delphij.net>, Xin LI writes: >| Does anyone know why accf_accept is disabled by default in the ports' >| stock Apache 2.2 (it's disabled in the default config files)? I thought >| it was because it was dangerous or flawed for some reason, though (at >| least for light loads comparable to those of OP) it seems to work fine. I think adding them to the apache is OK, as long as apache fails gracefully if they are not present in the kernel. >Yes, I wonder that too. Personally I think it might be a good idea to >just bind accf_http and accf_data into GENERIC, as I always add them >into kernel configuration at my company... My $0.02 No, GENERIC should not be bloated when it can be effortlessly loaded as a KLD. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk_at_FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.Received on Tue Apr 22 2008 - 19:32:29 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:30 UTC