On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 11:41:20AM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: > I'm trying to get a lagg interface with failover to work with bfe0 > and wlan0. The master port is bfe0, with failover to wlan0. The > wlan0 interface is ath0. > > I can get both wlan0 and bfe0 to work independently without being > lagg devices, but only bfe0 works when wlan0 and bfe0 are in a > lagg interface. In other words, when I pull the plug on bfe0, it > does not failover to wlan0. > > The system is a 1 month old -current (i386) that has been pretty > stable and I'm using something like this in /etc/rc.conf: > > wlans_ath0=wlan0 > ifconfig_wlan0="ssid my_ssid \ > wepkey 1:0xblah1 wepkey 2:0xblah2 \ > wepkey 3:0xblah3 wepkey 4:0xblah4 \ > weptxkey 1 authmode shared" > ifconfig_bfe0="up" > cloned_interfaces="lagg0" > ifconfig_lagg0="laggproto failover laggport bfe0 laggport wlan0" > ifconfig_lagg0_alias0="inet 10.0.0.7 netmask 0xffffff00" > > $ ifconfig -a > ath0: flags=8802<BROADCAST,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 2290 > ether 00:11:f5:9d:54:f5 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > media: IEEE 802.11 Wireless Ethernet autoselect mode 11g > status: associated > bfe0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500 > options=8<VLAN_MTU> > ether 00:14:22:ae:bc:98 > media: Ethernet autoselect (100baseTX <full-duplex>) > status: active > lagg: laggdev lagg0 > lo0: flags=8049<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 16384 > inet6 fe80::1%lo0 prefixlen 64 scopeid 0x4 > inet6 ::1 prefixlen 128 > inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 0xff000000 > lagg0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500 > ether 00:14:22:ae:bc:98 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > inet 10.0.0.7 netmask 0xffffff00 broadcast 10.0.0.255 > media: Ethernet autoselect > status: active > laggproto failover > laggport: wlan0 flags=0<> > laggport: bfe0 flags=5<MASTER,ACTIVE> > wlan0: flags=8843<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,SIMPLEX,MULTICAST> metric 0 mtu 1500 > ether 00:14:22:ae:bc:98 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ I wonder if it becuase the lagg driver sets the mac address of all its interfaces to the same value, this has not been propagated back up to the ath0 interface. I wonder if this is the right way to do things. AndrewReceived on Thu Aug 28 2008 - 13:40:32 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:34 UTC