Re: Inserting flow-control chars with an mpsafetty kernel

On 2008-Aug-29 00:58:39 +0200, Jilles Tjoelker <jilles_at_stack.nl> wrote:
>The faster response to ^C/^S/^Q can probably be lived without.

^Q/^S can be handled locally without major problem.  The lack of
remote ^C handling can be very annoying when you're on the wrong
end of a slow dialup link and there's 32KB of unwanted output
cached in the remote kernel.

-- 
Peter Jeremy
Please excuse any delays as the result of my ISP's inability to implement
an MTA that is either RFC2821-compliant or matches their claimed behaviour.