Re: HEADS UP: r185435 multi-IPv4/v6/no-IP jails in HEAD

From: Brian A. Seklecki <bseklecki_at_collaborativefusion.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Dec 2008 15:05:29 -0500

On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 20:47 +0100, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
> The question is, does it change existing behavior, or just add new
> functionality?

The syntax semantics should be backward compatible, so likely the
latter.


-- 
Brian A. Seklecki <bseklecki_at_collaborativefusion.com>
Collaborative Fusion, Inc.

application/pgp-signature attachment: This is a digitally signed message part

Received on Fri Dec 05 2008 - 19:05:31 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Stefan Bethke: "Labeling disks"
Previous message: Dag-Erling Smørgrav: "Re: HEADS UP: r185435 multi-IPv4/v6/no-IP jails in HEAD"
In reply to: Dag-Erling Smørgrav: "Re: HEADS UP: r185435 multi-IPv4/v6/no-IP jails in HEAD"
Next in thread: Philipp Wuensche: "Re: HEADS UP: r185435 multi-IPv4/v6/no-IP jails in HEAD"
Reply: Philipp Wuensche: "Re: HEADS UP: r185435 multi-IPv4/v6/no-IP jails in HEAD"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:38 UTC