Servus, I'm looking for advice on setting up a ZFS based hard disk backup solution. Given a large set of data, with perhaps 500MB data changes per day and two 1 TB disks, which option would you prefer and why: A) Separate ZFS pools on both disk. Using zfs send|recv to transfer snapshots every 2-3 days, taking the "backup" pool offline in the time in between (to keep the disk safe from surges, etc). or B) One ZFS mirror pool across both disk, resilvering the second half every 2-3 days and then detaching it again. Right now I'm favouring option A, as I can selectively "backup" part of the pool (excluding /usr/obj for example, though it is <10% of total capacity, so not a strong point), can use compression on the backup-pool and can potentially keep more snapshots on it than on the live pool. It should also be faster than resilvering the mirror every other day. I'd use B, iff ZFS is able to "self-heal" defective sectors on one mirror half, even if it is not fully resilvered. Does anyone know if this is possible? Cheers, Ulrich Spoerlein -- It is better to remain silent and be thought a fool, than to speak, and remove all doubt.Received on Wed Dec 10 2008 - 20:28:25 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:38 UTC