On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 10:58:14PM +0000, Robert Watson wrote: > > On Wed, 10 Dec 2008, Roman Divacky wrote: > > >hm... I wondered how it could work before that.... anyway, I got this crash > > Well, nothing says it still works that way, that's just the theory :-). > > >>So, given that this code has worked for quite a long time for many > >>people, this really raises two questions: (1) how reproduceable is this > >>and at what point does it kick in during the boot/runtime, and (2) when > >>did this start happening in terms of updating your source? > > > >ad (1): I get this on every boot when dhcp kicks in (it uses udp I > >believe) ie. 100% reproducible > > > >ad (2): Mon Dec 8 23:02:27 CET 2008 kernel (svn up-dated at most 10 > >minutes before that) works 100% ok > > > >I have the crash dump and the kernel at hand so I can do basically > >anything you ask me to do :) anything I can provide? > > Well, to be honest, the easiest thing to do may be to play the binary > search game to narrow down the point where the problem starts a bit more. > There are a few kinds of things that might lead to this problem -- perhaps > we (I?) mucked up initialization of the inpcb with recent changes, or a > virtualization-related change tripped something up, or a locking/scheduler > change or such. it's something between 185772 and 185864, dont you have any dhcp-enabled machine? if so.. can you reproduce that? > The other thing that would be helpful is a dump of *inp so that we can see > what state inp_lock is in. I foolishly deleted the kernel matching the vmcore, I'll try to do that tomorrowReceived on Thu Dec 11 2008 - 16:45:14 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:38 UTC