Re: HEADS UP: r185435 multi-IPv4/v6/no-IP jails in HEAD

Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Dec 2008, Philipp Wuensche wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
>> Brian A. Seklecki wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2008-12-05 at 20:47 +0100, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote:
>>>> The question is, does it change existing behavior, or just add new
>>>> functionality?
>>>
>>> The syntax semantics should be backward compatible, so likely the
>>> latter.
>>
>> Not entirely true, the jls output is totaly different than before and
>> breaks third-party applications like jailaudit and ezjail.
> 
> This is only true if you use any of the new features. In case you use
> single-IPv4 jails as before there should be absoultely no change in the
> output format.

Why do I get the new jls output then when I only use one ipaddr. for a
jail and none of the new features at all?

> PS: I trimmed the CC: list as noone was able to adhere to Reply-To.

freebsd-current should be in the CC as the discussion is if it is MFCd
and let loose to 7.2R

greetings,
Philipp