> Yes, but msk(4) had hacks in e100phy(4) to enable flow-controls. > I don't want to add these hacks to all other drivers in tree. Thanks for the explanation! I certainly understand not wanting to put non-standard hacks into the code. I imagine the number of people affected by this is minimal (like I said, the overall throughput/performance was fine). I'll just consider getting a PCI-E em(4) in the future if the PCI bus begins to become a bottleneck for me, which is unlikely as I have no raid in any of the connected machines with gigE. Regards, JoshReceived on Fri Dec 12 2008 - 03:03:05 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:38 UTC