Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > Marko Zec wrote: >> On Wednesday 17 December 2008 10:34:54 Paolo Pisati wrote: >>> Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: >>>> I just upgraded my i386 -CURRENT box from November 14 to today, and >>>> now my SSH-over-PPP VPN tunnel no longer works. I did some packet >>>> captures, and it appears that NAT is no longer working. If I send >>>> a telnet packet from my client side over the PPP tunnel, I see the >>>> SYN go out on the server side network properly translated. The >>>> destination host ACKs correctly, but the ACK never goes back across >>>> the tunnel. It's as if natd is no longer translating the packet on >>>> the inbound path. Besides the upgrade, nothing has changed in my >>>> environment. >>> lately some work has been done on the vimage and routing tree stuff, >>> thus your best bet is to go back >>> some days and try again. >> Hi Joe, >> >> could you try building your kernel with options VIMAGE_GLOBALS and tell >> us whether this makes any difference - turning on VIMAGE_GLOBALS should >> revert certain aspects of virtualization changes that recently got >> merged into the tree. > > Thanks for the suggestion, but the results are the same. I turned on > -verbose on natd, and I see the ACK packet come back from the > destination, and natd is translating it correctly. However, I never see > the ACK on the remote end of the tunnel. It looks like a routing > problem at this point. It's as if the kernel doesn't know on what > interface to encapsulate the reply packet. the arpv2 changes seem to have somehow changed point-to-point routes so it may be related to that.. I'll wait for Qing or Kmacy to check.... > > Joe > >> Cheers, >> >> Marko >> >> > >Received on Wed Dec 17 2008 - 17:01:29 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:39 UTC