On 12/21/08, Nathan Lay <nslay_at_comcast.net> wrote: > Paul B. Mahol wrote: >> On 12/21/08, Nathan Lay <nslay_at_comcast.net> wrote: >> >>> acpi.thermal.min_runtime: 0 >>> hw.acpi.thermal.polling_rate: 10 >>> hw.acpi.thermal.user_override: 0 >>> hw.acpi.thermal.tz0.temperature: 37.0C >>> hw.acpi.thermal.tz0.active: -1 >>> >> Is this one ever changed? >> >> >>> hw.acpi.thermal.tz0.passive_cooling: 1 >>> hw.acpi.thermal.tz0.thermal_flags: 0 >>> hw.acpi.thermal.tz0._PSV: 89.5C >>> hw.acpi.thermal.tz0._HOT: -1 >>> hw.acpi.thermal.tz0._CRT: 93.0C >>> hw.acpi.thermal.tz0._ACx: -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 >>> >> >> This one means that coling will never be used, why: >> my output looks like this: >> hw.acpi.thermal.tz0._ACx: 85.0C 75.0C 60.0C 50.0C -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 -1 >> >> >>> hw.acpi.thermal.tz0._TC1: 5 >>> hw.acpi.thermal.tz0._TC2: 4 >>> hw.acpi.thermal.tz0._TSP: 600 >>> >> >> You can play with all thermal values once you enable: >> hw.acpi.thermal.user_override >> >> But acpi may redo such values again after some time. >> You only real workaround is to use modified acpi ASL: >> it is explained in handbook. >> >> In my case I fixed in that way bogus kernel >> message "_CRT value is absurd, ignored". >> >> >> > hw.acpi never displayed thermal values for some reason. However, after > loading acpi_ibm, I can query those values without a problem > dev.acpi_ibm.0.thermal: 49 41 33 48 27 -1 22 -1 > > I'm not sure the critical temperature (99C) is a problem, but what I > have observed is you should never be near it. None of these thinkpads > got over 80C under load with FreeBSD installed until recently. ACPI's > ASL does not appear to be the problem as it has worked correctly in the > past. Until recenty when, can you point into svn revision? If the same overheat happens with acpi disabled that I dont see how freebsd acpi can help you. -- PaulReceived on Sun Dec 21 2008 - 16:19:34 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:39 UTC