Julian Elischer wrote: > Qing Li wrote: >> >> >> I believe examining the impacts of RTF_LLINFO on the ports was a good >> exercise even if we have to rejuvenate it. >> >> I hope we could reach a consensus soon now that we have more input >> from the ports developers. >> >> Please provide your input ... > > reintroduce it with value 0 > then teh optimiser should remove dead code... > The worry is that this will cause subtle bugs when code assumes functionality is present. We tried yanking this entirely and it's obviously caused some issues. The question now is whether to follow through and accept an incompatibility or put back sufficient compatibility to enable legacy code to work unchanged. SamReceived on Sat Dec 27 2008 - 22:07:28 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:39 UTC