* Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav (des_at_des.no) wrote: > Not cost-effective? What is the "street price" of 16 GB disk space > these days? About the same as a couple of Big Macs? That's roughly half of a common 36G SCSI drive, and still a fairly significant chunk of a 73G one. Granted, you probably don't get all that many high-memory systems with just one or two dinky disks. For us, our systems with the most memory have little need for much storage or IO; they have a pair of mirrored 73G SAS drives and 20G of memory; they currently run with 2G of swap, which if they ever have to use, will make them useless. Blowing 30% of available local storage on swap doesn't really make sense; we're much more likely to have 20G application cores than kernel ones. Speaking of, it'd be really nice if you could interrupt the generation of coredumps; big ones take a while. Perhaps the dump loop could check kern.coredump every few thousand pages and exit early if it's 0? -- Thomas 'Freaky' Hurst http://hur.st/Received on Sat Feb 16 2008 - 10:52:53 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:27 UTC