Re: [HEADS UP] ar(1) front-end committed. (notes for cross compile)

From: Ivan Voras <ivoras_at_freebsd.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:16:24 +0100

Kostik Belousov wrote:

> Shall the crossbuild for CURRENT work on RELENG_[67] ? If not, this is a
> huge regression.

Why wouldn't it, unless you're building amd64 CURRENT on i386
RELENG_[67] or a similar combination?

application/pgp-signature attachment: OpenPGP digital signature

Received on Thu Feb 21 2008 - 14:14:03 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: FreeBSD Tinderbox: "[head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sun4v"
Previous message: FreeBSD Tinderbox: "[head tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64"
In reply to: Kostik Belousov: "Re: [HEADS UP] ar(1) front-end committed. (notes for cross compile)"
Next in thread: Kostik Belousov: "Re: [HEADS UP] ar(1) front-end committed. (notes for cross compile)"
Reply: Kostik Belousov: "Re: [HEADS UP] ar(1) front-end committed. (notes for cross compile)"
Reply: Kai Wang: "Re: [HEADS UP] ar(1) front-end committed. (notes for cross compile)"
Reply: Ruslan Ermilov: "Re: [HEADS UP] ar(1) front-end committed. (notes for cross compile)"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:27 UTC