On Tue, 26 Feb 2008, Kip Macy wrote: KM>On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 2:37 PM, Julian Elischer <julian_at_elischer.org> wrote: KM>> Kris Kennaway wrote: KM>> > Julian Elischer wrote: KM>> >> Andre Oppermann wrote: KM>> >>> Brooks Davis wrote: KM>> >>>> On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 08:44:56PM -0800, Julian Elischer wrote: KM>> >>>> KM>> >>>>> At some stage in the next few weeks I will be trying to commit KM>> >>>>> Marco Zec's vimage code to -current. (only 'trying' not KM>> >>>>> for technical reasons, but political). KM>> >>> ... KM>> >>>>> Why now? KM>> >>>>> The code is in a shape where teh compiled out version of hte KM>> >>>>> system is stable. In the compiled in version, it is functional KM>> >>>>> enough to provide nearly all of what people want. It needs people KM>> >>>>> with other interests to adapt it to their purposes and use it so KM>> >>>>> that it can become a solid product for future releases. KM>> >>>> KM>> >>>> The website has a snapshot with a date over a month old and many KM>> >>>> comments about unstable interfaces. I've seen zero reports of KM>> >>>> substantial testing... KM>> >>> KM>> >>> What about locking and SMP scalability? Any new choke points? KM>> >> KM>> >> not that I've seen. KM>> > KM>> > That's a less than resounding endorsement :) KM>> KM>> do the 10Gb ethernet adapters have any major problems? KM>> are you willing to answer "no"? KM>> should we then rip them from the tree? KM>> KM>> I'm saying "this is work in progress" It seems stable and useful. KM>> until we can get more than 6 people running it we won't know more. KM>> KM> KM> KM> KM>Given how long it has been since RELENG_7 branched - if its really a KM>no-op when disabled, I personally don't see it any issues with it. yes++; hartiReceived on Wed Feb 27 2008 - 06:52:34 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:28 UTC