On Fri, Jan 04, 2008 at 08:27:41AM +0200, Ian FREISLICH wrote: >I have long lived processes that continuously handle very valuable >data and potentially get very large (several GB). I'd like that >process to be able to make a rational decision about what happens to its >memory contents when an allocation fails rather than having the >proverbial rug pulled out from under it. Rug pulling at any point >can cost an annual salary or two. If you google for freebsd+sigdanger, you will find that this topic was first discussed nearly 10 years ago. Unfortunately, no progress appears to have been made, though it crops up every few years. -- Peter Jeremy Please excuse any delays as the result of my ISP's inability to implement an MTA that is either RFC2821-compliant or matches their claimed behaviour.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:24 UTC