Re: sbrk(2) broken

From: Igor Mozolevsky <igor_at_hybrid-lab.co.uk>
Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 10:41:17 +0000

On 04/01/2008, Robert Watson <rwatson_at_freebsd.org> wrote:

> To be clear, in the new world order, instead of getting NULL
> back from malloc(3), SIGKILL is delivered to large processes.

Huh??? Again, huh???

Received on Fri Jan 04 2008 - 09:41:19 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Dag-Erling Smørgrav: "Re: sbrk(2) broken"
Previous message: Tai-hwa Liang: "Re: [Fwd: Re: kern/118258 sysctl causing panics on 7.0-xxx]"
In reply to: Robert Watson: "Re: sbrk(2) broken"
Next in thread: Dag-Erling Smørgrav: "Re: sbrk(2) broken"
Reply: Dag-Erling Smørgrav: "Re: sbrk(2) broken"
Reply: Robert Watson: "Re: sbrk(2) broken"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:24 UTC