Kris Kennaway wrote: > Ivan Voras wrote: >> Robert Watson wrote: >> >>> I'm not sure if anyone has mentioned this yet in the thread, but >>> another thing worth taking into account in considering the stability >>> of ZFS is whether or not Sun considers it a production feature in >>> Solaris. Last I heard, it was still considered an experimental >>> feature there as well. >> >> Last I heard, rsync didn't crash Solaris on ZFS :) > > [Citation needed] I can't provide citation about a thing that doesn't happen - you don't hear things like "oh and yesterday I ran rsync on my Solaris with ZFS and *it didn't crash*!" often. But, with some grains of salt taken, consider this Google results: * searching for "rsync crash solaris zfs": 790 results, most of them obviously irrelevant * searching for "rsync crash freebsd zfs": 10,800 results; a small number of the results is from this thread, some are duplicates, but it's a large number in any case. I feel that the number of Solaris+ZFS installations worldwide is larger than that of FreeBSD+ZFS and they've had ZFS longer.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:25 UTC