Nate Lawson wrote: > I am not sure this patch should be committed as-is. It might be better > centralized in the cpufreq mid-layer so that all drivers benefit instead > of just acpi_perf. If there are frequencies that are too close to each > other (no matter what the source driver), it might be good to eliminate > them. > > I'll look into it later today. > > -Nate > I fully agree that centralized solution is better. But at this late stage of RELENG_7_0, I'm happy with this patch, as it solves our problem and is very simple. If you can come with something better before 7-RELEASE, it's OK, but otherwise I think we should have this patch in the CVS and then RELENG_7_0 (even marked as XXX) The other patch actually is in powerd.c and with it doesn't matter what is the source of the information, but I personally, more like the acpi_perf patch :)Received on Sun Jan 13 2008 - 00:13:59 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:25 UTC