On Jan 15, 2008 3:02 PM, Jiawei Ye <leafy7382_at_gmail.com> wrote: > On Jan 15, 2008 8:24 AM, Xin LI <delphij_at_delphij.net> wrote: > > > Jiawei Ye wrote: > > > I have upgraded my machine to -current as of Jan 14. java/jdk16 > > stalled at > > > va/jdk16/work/hotspot/src/share/vm/services > > > -I/usr/ports/java/jdk16/work/hotspot/src/share/vm/utilities > > > -I/usr/ports/java/jdk16/work/hotspot/src/cpu/i486/vm > > > -I/usr/ports/java/jdk16/work/hotspot/src/os/bsd/vm > > > -I/usr/ports/java/jdk16/work/hotspot/src/os_cpu/bsd_i486/vm > > -I../generated > > > -DHOTSPOT_BUILD_VERSION="\" 1.6.0_03-p3-leafy_15_jan_2008_05_57-b00\"" > > > -DHOTSPOT_BUILD_USER="\"root\"" -DHOTSPOT_RELEASE_VERSION="\"1.6.0\"" > > -O2 > > > -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -DCOMPILER2 -fno-rtti -fno-exceptions > > -pthread > > > -fcheck-new -m32 -march=i586 -pipe -DCOMPILER2 -fPIC -fno-rtti > > > -fno-exceptions -pthread -fcheck-new -m32 -march=i586 -pipe -O3 > > > -fno-strict-aliasing -DVM_LITTLE_ENDIAN -Werror -Wpointer-arith > > -Wconversion > > > -Wsign-compare -c -x c++-header -c > > ../generated/incls/_precompiled.incl > > > -o incls/_precompiled.incl.gch > > > ^Cgmake[5]: *** Deleting file `incls/_precompiled.incl.gch' > > > gmake[5]: *** [incls/_precompiled.incl.gch] Interrupt: 2 > > > gmake[4]: *** [the_vm] Interrupt: 2 > > > gmake[3]: *** [product] Interrupt: 2 > > > gmake[2]: *** [generic_build2] Interrupt: 2 > > > gmake[1]: *** [product] Interrupt: 2 > > > gmake: *** [hotspot-build] Interrupt: 2 > > > > > > The compilation went on for 1.5hr before I killed it. Bootstrapped > > with > > > diablo-jdk15. > > > > > > Has anyone else seen this symptom? > > > > What does '^T' (Ctrl+T) say? > > > > Cheers, > > - -- > > Xin LI <delphij_at_delphij.net> http://www.delphij.net/ > > > > Here it is: > > load: 1.00 cmd: cc1plus 31106 [runnable] 4011.05u 0.46s 100% 109568k > load: 1.00 cmd: cc1plus 31106 [runnable] 4011.73u 0.46s 100% 109568k > load: 1.00 cmd: cc1plus 31106 [runnable] 4012.04u 0.46s 100% 109568k > load: 1.00 cmd: cc1plus 31106 [runnable] 4012.31u 0.46s 100% 109568k > load: 1.00 cmd: cc1plus 31106 [runnable] 4012.99u 0.46s 100% 109568k > load: 1.00 cmd: cc1plus 31106 [runnable] 4013.31u 0.46s 100% 109568k > load: 1.00 cmd: cc1plus 31106 [runnable] 4013.54u 0.46s 100% 109568k > load: 1.00 cmd: cc1plus 31106 [runnable] 4015.31u 0.46s 100% 109568k > load: 1.00 cmd: cc1plus 31106 [runnable] 4015.61u 0.46s 100% 109568k > load: 1.00 cmd: cc1plus 31106 [runnable] 4015.83u 0.46s 100% 109568k > load: 1.00 cmd: cc1plus 31106 [runnable] 4467.44u 0.46s 98% 109568k > load: 1.02 cmd: cc1plus 31106 [runnable] 4586.39u 0.46s 98% 109568k > load: 1.01 cmd: cc1plus 31106 [runnable] 4612.37u 0.46s 100% 109568k > > Regards, > > > This compile has been going on for over 2hrs. The same system with an older -current used to compile the whole JDK16 in about 2hrs, now the output from ctrl-t load: 1.00 cmd: cc1plus 31106 [runnable] 8489.21u 0.46s 100% 109568k This certainly does not look right at all. Any suggestion to investigate further? Jiawei -- "If it looks like a duck, walks like a duck, and quacks like a duck, then to the end user it's a duck, and end users have made it pretty clear they want a duck; whether the duck drinks hot chocolate or coffee is irrelevant."Received on Tue Jan 15 2008 - 07:11:26 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:26 UTC