* Jung-uk Kim <jkim_at_FreeBSD.org> [080119 00:05] wrote: > While I was working on kern/113218, I realized it is a bigger problem > than I originally thought: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=113218 > > Because fixing this PR breaks ABI, I had to make compat shims. But > the question is which branch to break? Since we are very close to > 7.0-RELEASE, the question became more complicated. A lot of people > are asking me to fix this PR because it is much needed fix for large > database installations, so I have to make a quick decision. :-( I think this is a step forward so it's not so bad, just make sure to talk to "re_at_" about your MFCs, if it'll work out. > > I think I have four options (with corresponding patches): > - Option 1: HEAD. > - Option 2: HEAD and RELENG_7. > - Option 3: HEAD, RELENG_7, and RELENG_7_0. > - Option 4: Don't do anything ATM. Break it with ipc_perm later. I like option 3 if possible. > FYI, fixing ipc_perm is a lot more complicated and very intrusive. Why does ipc_perm need fixing? -- - Alfred PerlsteinReceived on Sat Jan 19 2008 - 11:45:53 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:26 UTC