2008/1/27, Doug Barton <dougb_at_freebsd.org>: > Attilio Rao wrote: > > 2008/1/26, Doug Barton <dougb_at_freebsd.org>: > >> Yar Tikhiy wrote: > >> > >>> No doubt. :-) But the urgency of this problem appears much lower > >>> than that I estimated in the first place--fortunately. Broken UFS > >>> would be a nightmare. > >> IMO if we're going to ship NTFS support in the base it should actually > >> function, or at minimum not panic the box. As I reported earlier, I can > >> panic my -current system with 100% reliability with fairly light access > >> to an NTFS volume, which I consider to be a fairly large problem, at > >> least for my personal usage pattern. > > > > I'm not sure now, are you referring to some problems introduced by my > > patches or not? > > Not sure of the timeline. I think this is the most relevant post on > the matter, let me know if there is anything I can do to help diagnose > this. As my really first commit about VFS happened on 28 december (and it should also be a nop), and you reported a 23 december kernel, it seems like the problem was alredy there by time. Attilio -- Peace can only be achieved by understanding - A. EinsteinReceived on Sat Jan 26 2008 - 23:57:18 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:26 UTC