On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 11:43:10AM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote: > > The assertion failing should not happen now. > Could you please hand-add a check in _lockmgr_disown() > (kern/kern_lock.c) in order to check for the panicstr before to call > WITNESS? I cannot access to perforce now and produce a suitable diff, > so you can just do this by hand: > > if (lkp->lk_lockholder == td) { > if (panicstr != NULL) > WITNESS_UNLOCK(&lkp->lk_object, LOP_EXCLUSIVE, file, line); > td->td_locks--; > } Shouldn't the test for panicstr be inverse: `panicstr == NULL'? I guess we shouldn't call WITNESS when panicing, should we? Sorry if I got it wrong. -- YarReceived on Thu Jan 31 2008 - 12:02:14 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:26 UTC