On Sat, 19 Jul 2008 20:36:22 -0400, "Alexandre \"Sunny\" Kovalenko" <gaijin.k_at_gmail.com> wrote: > What I meant is that my laptop, runnig RELENG_7 is pretty happy with > "C2" (set through /etc/rc.conf as performance_cx_lowest="C2", and even > "C3" (set through /etc/sysctl.conf as dev.cpu.1.cx_lowest=C3), so long > as cpu0 is not allowed to go into C3. You seemed to indicate that in > your case nothing but "C1" worked. If you just did not try the > configuration above, would you, please, try it and see if it works. > Apart from, hopefully, giving someone the data point, it will make > your laptop cooler and less power hungry. Ah, now I get it :) Well, I did try the following after booting with both CPUs in C1 state: (1) hw.acpi.cpu.cx_lowest: C1 dev.cpu.0.cx_lowest: C1 dev.cpu.0.cx_lowest: C2 I left the laptop to boot with both CPUs in C1, and then after a while I manually set dev.cpu.0.cx_lowest=C2. This setup seems ok. I can see processes being scheduled on both cpu.0 and cpu.1 and there's no "freeze" when the laptop is idle. (2) hw.acpi.cpu.cx_lowest: C1 dev.cpu.0.cx_lowest: C1 dev.cpu.0.cx_lowest: C3 Same as above, only this time I set dev.cpu.0.cx_lowest=C3. (3) hw.acpi.cpu.cx_lowest: C1 dev.cpu.0.cx_lowest: C2 dev.cpu.0.cx_lowest: C2 Not ok. When the laptop stays idle for some time, it starts getting too slow to type stuff in a terminal, and after a while I get `calcru: runtime went backwards' messages. I don't know if being scheduled on cpu.1 when it is in C2/C3 state has any measurable impact on user processes. Should I leave the settings to option (1) or (2) above for a while? Is there any way to find out if this causes any problems? Right now I am running for a couple of minutes with $ sysctl -a | fgrep .cx_ hw.acpi.cpu.cx_lowest: C1 dev.cpu.0.cx_supported: C1/1 C2/1 C3/57 dev.cpu.0.cx_lowest: C1 dev.cpu.0.cx_usage: 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% dev.cpu.1.cx_supported: C1/1 C2/1 C3/57 dev.cpu.1.cx_lowest: C2 dev.cpu.1.cx_usage: 0.00% 100.00% 0.00% and things seem ok so far :-) Thank you for all the help. It's been _very_ useful :) > Few more data points: > -- CPU0 and CPU1 are somehow not treated interchangeably by FreeBSD. > -- at some point when earth was warm and 7.0 was CURRENT, "C3" used to > work on my laptop, even on CPU0. > -- I have not filed a PR. If you think it is warranted, you could do it > or I can -- it's just I did a couple of embarrassing ones and got > somewhat trigger-shy ;) Heh. I've filed my own share of bogus PRs too. Please don't feel shy, and just report whatever seems out of the ordinary. It's better to have a few extra PRs that are not really bugs, than never-fixed bugs :)Received on Sat Jul 19 2008 - 23:00:37 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:33 UTC