So are we saying that i386 with a default kmem of 512MB has gotten psuedo stable with some load? On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 14:57 +0200, Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > On Mon, Jul 28, 2008 at 02:54:36PM +0200, Max Laier wrote: > > On Monday 28 July 2008 10:33:03 Pawel Jakub Dawidek wrote: > > > Yes, it should fix most if not all 'kmem_map too small' panics, at least > > > from what I tried. Tunning kmem_size is still needed to get better > > > performance. > > > > With the i386 default settings it was not too hard to get the attached panic. > > Some cpdup and rm cycles of src and ports to a single disk zfs pool. With > > 512M I haven't been able to kill it, yet. > > I was probably too optimistic. The default kmem_size is probably just > too low. I'm quite sure it would be too low even for Solaris. >Received on Mon Jul 28 2008 - 11:27:16 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:33 UTC