Hello all, I was wondering if there's been any serious thought put into migrating from smbfs (unmaintained project in kernel / userland since 2001) to cifs (currently supported Samba project). This is the mount_smbfs user tool that's available in userland. There are some related questions about this and observations that I've made: Pros: 1. cifs is the successor to smbfs, which is good from a performance and feature enhancement end. 2. It's supported, which means that any bugs in the code can be filed upstream and we'll be helped. This is an important point as I appear to be hard locking up my system with some kind of non-MPSAFE issue at kernel level on a very fresh copy of -CURRENT. Cons: 1. cifs is currently Linux centric (it currently uses quite a few Linux calls and references the Linux module code base); that will need to be fixed. 2. It's GPL v2 licensed, which means that more GPL code will "infect" the kernel, whereas smbfs was in a more BSD-like license format. So, my question would be "do the pros outweigh the cons for attempting to migrate from smbfs to cifs in the kernel?" Thanks, -GarrettReceived on Mon Jun 09 2008 - 16:02:46 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:31 UTC