Re: execvpe port breakage

From: Ed Schouten <ed_at_80386.nl>
Date: Sun, 22 Jun 2008 01:23:01 +0200

David,

* David Xu <davidxu_at_freebsd.org> wrote:
> Looks like the application defined its own version of execvpe() ?
> I think we should change name execvpe in our header file to something
> else to avoid conflict.

What do you think about the attached patch?

-- 
 Ed Schouten <ed_at_80386.nl>
 WWW: http://80386.nl/

text/plain attachment: execvpe.diff

application/pgp-signature attachment: stored

Received on Sat Jun 21 2008 - 21:23:03 UTC

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Ruslan Ermilov: "Re: execvpe port breakage"
Previous message: Ruslan Ermilov: "Re: ${NORMAL_CTFCONVERT} expands to empty string ???"
In reply to: David Xu: "Re: execvpe port breakage"
Next in thread: David Xu: "Re: execvpe port breakage"
Reply: David Xu: "Re: execvpe port breakage"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:32 UTC