Re: knlist_cleardel() panic

From: John-Mark Gurney <jmg_at_funkthat.com>
Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2008 16:37:06 -0800
Kostik Belousov wrote this message on Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 22:06 +0200:
> On Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 11:53:34AM -0800, John-Mark Gurney wrote:
> > Kostik Belousov wrote this message on Sun, Mar 02, 2008 at 17:25 +0200:
> > > The panic below was already reported, but now I got it on my desktop
> > > and was able to investigate further.
> > > 
> > > #5  0xc06daf36 in trap (frame=0xe8093b1c)
> > >     at /usr/bsd/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:490
> > > #6  0xc06c0b4b in calltrap () at /usr/bsd/src/sys/i386/i386/exception.s:139
> > > #7  0xc0493968 in knlist_cleardel (knl=0xcabec128, td=0x0, islocked=1, 
> > >     killkn=0) at atomic.h:149
> > > #8  0xc04f520c in pipeclose (cpipe=0xcabec0b8)
> > >     at /usr/bsd/src/sys/kern/sys_pipe.c:1508
> > > #9  0xc04f5320 in pipe_close (fp=0xc5ce8630, td=0xcac01aa0)
> > >     at /usr/bsd/src/sys/kern/sys_pipe.c:1425
> > > #10 0xc0489442 in fdrop (fp=0xc5ce8630, td=0xcac01aa0) at file.h:297
> > > #11 0xc048accf in closef (fp=0xc5ce8630, td=0xcac01aa0)
> > >     at /usr/bsd/src/sys/kern/kern_descrip.c:1958
> > > #12 0xc048b1ff in kern_close (td=0xcac01aa0, fd=10)
> > >     at /usr/bsd/src/sys/kern/kern_descrip.c:1054
> > > #13 0xc048b2da in close (td=0xcac01aa0, uap=0xe8093cfc)
> > >     at /usr/bsd/src/sys/kern/kern_descrip.c:1006
> > > ---Type <return> to continue, or q <return> to quit---
> > > #14 0xc06da865 in syscall (frame=0xe8093d38)
> > >     at /usr/bsd/src/sys/i386/i386/trap.c:1035
> > > #15 0xc06c0bb0 in Xint0x80_syscall ()
> > >     at /usr/bsd/src/sys/i386/i386/exception.s:196
> > > 
> > > At the frame 8, we have
> > > (kgdb) p/x *(knl->kl_list->slh_first)
> > > $9 = {kn_link = {sle_next = 0x0}, kn_selnext = {sle_next = 0x0},
> > >   kn_knlist = 0x0, kn_tqe = {tqe_next = 0xc58de484, tqe_prev = 0xc5e9ab20},
> > >   kn_kq = 0x0, kn_kevent = {ident = 0x0, filter = 0x0, flags = 0x0,
> > >     fflags = 0x0, data = 0x0, udata = 0x0}, kn_status = 0x20,
> > >   kn_sfflags = 0x0, kn_sdata = 0x0, kn_ptr = {p_fp = 0x0, p_proc = 0x0,
> > >     p_aio = 0x0, p_lio = 0x0}, kn_fop = 0x0, kn_hook = 0x0}
> > > 
> > > The knote is KN_MARKER, and the kn_kq is NULL. The result is that KQ_LOCK
> > > in the knlist_cleardel()::SLIST_FOREACH_SAFE() loop dereferences NULL and
> > > panics.
> > > 
> > > Does the following change makes any sense?
> > 
> > I thought this was a bug, but upon further examination, there is
> > something wrong...  a KN_MARKER knote should never be on the knlist..
> > It is only ever added to kq's even list, never to an object's list...
> > 
> > If you could walk the knl->kl_list through kn_selnext, and ensure
> > that the kn w/ kN_MARKER exists would be good...  It should be
> > last one as kn_selnext is NULL...
> 
> As I shown above, the KN_MARKER was found on the cpipe->pipe_sel.si_note,
> 
> (kgdb) p cpipe->pipe_sel.si_note
> $1 = {kl_list = {slh_first = 0xc58df330}, 
>   kl_lock = 0xc0493a20 <knlist_mtx_lock>, 
>   kl_unlock = 0xc0493370 <knlist_mtx_unlock>, 
>   kl_locked = 0xc0493350 <knlist_mtx_locked>, kl_lockarg = 0xcabec170
> }
> 
> (kgdb) p/x (knl->kl_list->slh_first)
> $2 = 0xc58df330
> 
> (kgdb) p/x *(knl->kl_list->slh_first)
> $3 = {kn_link = {sle_next = 0x0}, kn_selnext = {sle_next = 0x0}, 
>   kn_knlist = 0x0, kn_tqe = {tqe_next = 0xc58de484, tqe_prev = 0xc5e9ab20}, 
>   kn_kq = 0x0, kn_kevent = {ident = 0x0, filter = 0x0, flags = 0x0, 
>     fflags = 0x0, data = 0x0, udata = 0x0}, kn_status = 0x20, 
>   kn_sfflags = 0x0, kn_sdata = 0x0, kn_ptr = {p_fp = 0x0, p_proc = 0x0, 
>     p_aio = 0x0, p_lio = 0x0}, kn_fop = 0x0, kn_hook = 0x0}
> > 
> > I can't think of a way that this can happen, as the only way to get
> > on the knlist is by calling knlist_add, and it should only ever be
> > called from f_attach, which is called in one place, and has to have
> > kn_kq set properly...  Are there any custom patches on the system?
> 
> This is the stock RELENG_7 as of today.

Do you have a reproducable test case that demonstrates this?

You can try the attached patch, but I'm pretty sure that it won't be
triggered...

-- 
  John-Mark Gurney				Voice: +1 415 225 5579

     "All that I will do, has been done, All that I have, has not."

Received on Sun Mar 02 2008 - 23:37:07 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wed May 19 2021 - 11:39:28 UTC